Difference between revisions of "The Infernal Dictionary"

no edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:9 Paimon.png|350px|thumb|The Goetic Demon Paimon as pictured in the 6th Edition]]
[[File:Gaap.jpg|350px|thumb|The Goetic Demon [[Gaap]] as pictured in the 6th Edition]]
The '''''Dictionnaire infernal''''' (English: "Infernal Dictionary") is a book on demonology, describing [[demon]]s organised in [[hierarchy of Hell|hierarchies]]. It was written by [[Jacques Collin de Plancy]] and first published in 1818. There were several editions of the book; perhaps the most famous is the 1863 edition, which included sixty-nine illustrations by Louis Le Breton depicting the appearances of several of the demons. Many but not all of these images were later used in [[S. L. MacGregor Mathers]]'s edition of the ''[[Lesser Key of Solomon]]''.
The '''''Dictionnaire infernal''''' (English: "Infernal Dictionary") is a book on demonology, describing [[demon]]s organised in [[hierarchy of Hell|hierarchies]]. It was written by [[Jacques Collin de Plancy]] and first published in 1818. There were several editions of the book; perhaps the most famous is the 1863 edition, which included sixty-nine illustrations by Louis Le Breton depicting the appearances of several of the demons.
 
Many, but not all of these images were later used in [[S. L. MacGregor Mathers]]'s edition of the ''[[Lesser Key of Solomon]]''.


==Publication history==
==Publication history==
Line 14: Line 16:
==Content==
==Content==
[[File:1 Bael.png|350px|thumb|The Goetic demon Bael as pictured in the 6th edition]]
[[File:1 Bael.png|350px|thumb|The Goetic demon Bael as pictured in the 6th edition]]
Many articles written in the ''Dictionnaire Infernal'' illustrate the author's vacillation between rationalism, faith, and willingness to believe without evidence. For example, he admits the possible effectiveness of chiromancy, while rejecting [[cartomancy]]: "It is certain that chiromancy, and especially physiognomy, have at least some plausibility: they draw their predictions from signs which relate to features which distinguish and characterize people; of lines which the subjects carry with themselves, which are the work of nature, and that someone can believe significant, since they are unique to each individual. But the cards, merely human artifacts, not knowing either the future, nor the present, nor the past, have nothing of the individuality of the person consulting them. For a thousand different people they will have the same result; and consulted twenty times about the same subject, they will produce twenty contradictory productions."
Many articles written in the ''Dictionnaire Infernal'' illustrate the author's vacillation between rationalism, faith, and willingness to believe without evidence. For example, he admits the possible effectiveness of [[chiromancy]], while rejecting [[cartomancy]]: "It is certain that chiromancy, and especially physiognomy, have at least some plausibility: they draw their predictions from signs which relate to features which distinguish and characterize people; of lines which the subjects carry with themselves, which are the work of nature, and that someone can believe significant, since they are unique to each individual. But the cards, merely human artifacts, not knowing either the future, nor the present, nor the past, have nothing of the individuality of the person consulting them. For a thousand different people they will have the same result; and consulted twenty times about the same subject, they will produce twenty contradictory productions."


The book contains a listing of the [[Goetic demon]]s, with corresponding illustrations in the 6th edition for many (although not all) of them.
The book contains a listing of the [[Goetic demon]]s, with corresponding illustrations in the 6th edition for many (although not all) of them.
Line 33: Line 35:


[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Featured Articles]]