6,493
edits
Difference between revisions of "Antichrist"
→Early church beliefs
Occultwiki (talk | contribs) |
Occultwiki (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The only one of the late 1st/early 2nd century Apostolic Fathers to use the term is Polycarp (c. 69 – c. 155) who warned the Philippians that everyone who preached false doctrine was an antichrist. His use of the term Antichrist follows that of the New Testament in not identifying a single personal Antichrist, but a class of people. | The only one of the late 1st/early 2nd century Apostolic Fathers to use the term is Polycarp (c. 69 – c. 155) who warned the Philippians that everyone who preached false doctrine was an antichrist. His use of the term Antichrist follows that of the New Testament in not identifying a single personal Antichrist, but a class of people. | ||
Irenaeus (2nd century AD – c. 202) wrote ''Against Heresies'' to refute the teachings of the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]. In Book V of ''Against Heresies'' he addresses the figure of the Antichrist referring to him as the "recapitulation of apostasy and rebellion." He uses "[[666]]", the Number of the Beast from Revelation 13:18, to numerologically decode several possible names. Some names that he loosely proposed were "Evanthos", "Lateinos" ("Latin" or pertaining to the Roman Empire). In his exegesis of Daniel 7:21, he stated that the ten horns of the beast will be the Roman Empire divided into ten kingdoms before the Antichrist's arrival. Additionally, he stated that the antichrist would be of the tribe of Dan, evoking Jeremiah 8:16. This would correlate to the Talmudic view of the Jewish Messiah coming from the tribe of Dan on his maternal line. However, his readings of the Antichrist were more in broader theological terms rather than within a historical context. | Irenaeus (2nd century AD – c. 202) wrote ''Against Heresies'' to refute the teachings of the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]. In Book V of ''Against Heresies'' he addresses the figure of the Antichrist referring to him as the "recapitulation of apostasy and rebellion." He uses "[[666]]", the Number of the Beast from Revelation 13:18, to [[numerology|numerologically]] decode several possible names. Some names that he loosely proposed were "Evanthos", "Lateinos" ("Latin" or pertaining to the Roman Empire). In his exegesis of Daniel 7:21, he stated that the ten horns of the beast will be the Roman Empire divided into ten kingdoms before the Antichrist's arrival. Additionally, he stated that the antichrist would be of the tribe of Dan, evoking Jeremiah 8:16. This would correlate to the Talmudic view of the Jewish Messiah coming from the tribe of Dan on his maternal line. However, his readings of the Antichrist were more in broader theological terms rather than within a historical context. | ||
The non-canonical ''Ascension of Isaiah'' presents a detailed exposition of the Antichrist as [[Belial]] and Emperor Nero. | The non-canonical ''Ascension of Isaiah'' presents a detailed exposition of the Antichrist as [[Belial]] and Emperor Nero. | ||